Brc iso 22000 comparison

IOP It does not sound as prescriptive as feared which means each system can stand alone through integrations and yet have two auditable systems which also means spending more money Charles Chew. Posted 05 May - PM. Possible benefits are: 1. It will be Internationally recognised. Although most probably customers will still require their own country or industry specific standards and guidelines to provide the prerequisite programs and GMP's. ISO will have a parallel structure to ISO allowing for easier integration and maybe even requiring continual improvement.

Make consultants and certification bodies wads of money. Hard to say until we've all read it. Can anyone think of any other possible benefits?

Regards, Simon. No added advantages. Don't need any integration! Benefit 3 - Love this one Charles Chew. Posted 06 May - AM. I am a consultant in Spain so you can see I love simon's third point of view. Iso will harmonize many protocols regarding food safety. ISO 22K will be international, what this means is that any arganization certified with ISO can say to any client anywhere that your products are safe, that your HACCP works not only by internal audits but for a certificaton body.

HACCP can only be certified by the duch standard nowdays. It is really a thrust issue. Nobody wants to thrust anyone even more in food bussiness. For a example: One company which I sometimes work for: They export cookies to the whole world.

They have about 15 audits from differentes standars every year. This means about Euros for each one, this mean about Euros a year plus my company fee.

See why you love Simon's third point of view. We share some common interest here. Dutch standard is but only one of them, however, one thing is for sure If ISO 22K is going to be less prescriptive, I wonder if it is desirable to pursue it when recognised current accredited schemes are already sufficient to proof what we are doing is enough. Adding more documentations to an already congested "paper environment" may be counter effective particularly to the small and medium size organizations.

Until the final draft is out, I am not sure if ISO 22K would add any thing more effective to what is already put in place in current schemes but if duplications prevail, maybe cost saving is an interesting point. Posted 06 May - PM. ISO 22K will be international, what this means is that any arganization certified with ISO can say to any client anywhere that your products are safe. Posted 12 May - PM. OK, so if we are going to look at implementing 22k does that mean we can get rid of 9k2k or BRC, or will we end up having to run all three togeher?

What happen to it? Yet you probably have heard of HAXXP which is still in the market but I am not sure whether companies have a reason to go for it. There are good reasons for wanting a new industrial standard for whatever the purpose but it is difficult to achieve a global embrace.

General comments were, if the current system is working well for you, why change? Well, ISO 22K has got to provide significant "benefits" to warrant any serious management review. As the saying goes, "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" Understandably, we need to move forward. Posted 10 July - AM. The key disadvantage with the current state of HACCP schems are that international accreditation bodies have not come up with a harmonised approval method. ISO is leading us towards this path already, however, there is an urgent need for accreditation agencies to provide a roadmap to the future harmonised HACCP approval method for CB's.

Posted 10 July - PM. Dear Hak, You are so right. Now that we will soon be having ISO 22K, it should take its own course. This cannot come at a better time. Look forward to your further contributions. Regards CharlesChew. Posted 25 September - PM. Correct me if I'm wrong As it is at present Posted 26 September - PM.

Hi, Welcome to the forum. My personal viewpoint on this subject. ISO 9K2K. HACCP is also not a loose "canon system" so to speak but the Auditors may be with regards to interpetations as each ind.

You are right. It was not positively received. You will definitely need a copy of both to complete your project. Once you have both your project should be relatively straight forward. Regards, Tony.

If that is confusing, please let me know! Coz it is not as bad as it may look like! Cheers Kamila. Posted 23 December - AM. One topic which could be useful when making comparison BRC vs ISO is to what extent different functions within company are involved.

BRC involves Supply Chain, maintenance and to some extent new product development. Function like finance is involved somewhat indirectly, sales - only when customer satisfaction is concerned. ISO covers all proceses within company but at the same time it is more general and looses the focus on product safety. Posted 24 December - AM.

Posted 19 November - AM. I have this project also. Community Forum Software by IP. Board Licensed to: Saferpak Limited. FSL Articles Blogs Events Images Sitemap. What is GFSI? What is BRC Certification? What is SQF Certification? What is IFS Certification? Javascript Disabled Detected You currently have javascript disabled. You cannot start a new topic Please log in to reply.

Fatemeh likes this. Thanked by 1 Member:. C Charles. Posted 26 August - PM Dear costas, Welcome to the forum You will also need a copy of the iso standard. Created in after the BRC and IFS, it harmonises the requirements of these two predecessors in order to meet the same objective: food safety for the consumer.

The BRC standards are aimed particularly at those in the agri-food industry who want to work with distributors. Products By Bayt. Use Our Mobile App. Get Fresh Updates On your job applications, and stay connected. Download Now. Start networking and exchanging professional insights Register now or log in to join your professional community.